Norbert Gombos vs Ulises Blanch Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gombos vs Blanch analysis and find out who is favored!
Norbert Gombos vs Ulises Blanch Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gombos 1 - 0 Blanch
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gombos has won 47.45% of points on their second serve, while Blanch has won 48.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gombos, in recent form, has won 48.55% of their opponent's second serve points, while Blanch has won 54.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.34% and 31.95% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gombos has saved 56.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Blanch has saved 68.6% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gombos has won 35.29% of matches played (W/L 12/ 22), with Blanch winning 65.79% (W/L 25/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gombos has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 261/ 185), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 9/ 14). Blanch has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 86/ 80).
- Player level: In the last year, Gombos has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.67% of matches (W/L 11/ 19), where as Blanch has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 18/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gombos winning 1 times and Blanch being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gombos winning 2 and Blanch winning 1. The last match between Gombos and Blanch was at the Orleans Challenger, 27-09-2022, First, I.hard with Norbert Gombos getting the victory 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:50.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gombos and Blanch have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gombos winning 1 times and Blanch 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gombos winning 1, and Blanch 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gombos has played against opponents with an average rank of 315.74 while Blanch has played against players with an average rank of 248.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gombos has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Blanch has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gombos has converted 36.52% of breakpoint opportunities, and Blanch has converted 37.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
10
Total
0
Mast
7
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
557
Rank
80
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
458
Rank
236
High
26
Age
R
Plays
4
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
56% (522-404)
Career Total W/L
53% (215-188)
41% (7-10)
YTD W/L
76% (13-4)
$1,135,685
Career Prize Money
$54,150
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Norbert Gombos vs Ulises Blanch For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gombos VS Blanch
stats | Norbert Gombos | Ulises Blanch |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 17 | 16 |
Aces (Total) | 8 | 10 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 2:9:50 | 2:9:50 |
1st Serve % | 63% (64/101) | 72% (75/104) |
1st Serve Win% | 75% (48/64) | 69% (52/75) |
2nd Serve Win% | 51% (19/37) | 38% (11/29) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 75% (3/4) |
Return Points W% | 39% (41/104) | 34% (34/101) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 |
Norbert Gombos
Player
Ulises Blanch
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
75 of
104)
8
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Norbert Gombos | Ulises Blanch |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 41% (7/10) | 76% (13/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (17/25) | 67% (26/13) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (184/217) | 54% (204/176) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 77% (10/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 75% (3/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.3 | 0.59 |
Aces Total | 60 | 109 |
DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.54 |
DFs Total | 64 | 99 |
Avg Match Time | 1:49:51 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 329.35 | 256.24 |
1st Serve % | 53% (657/1245) | 57% (720/1264) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (465/657) | 74% (530/720) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (279/588) | 48% (262/544) |
BPs Won% Total | 37% (42/115) | 38% (52/138) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (475/1279) | 40% (503/1259) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 75% (6/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 78% (7/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 76% (13/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 57% (4/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 100% (5/5) |
1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 100% (12/12) |
1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (12/0) |
1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 20% (5/1) |
Norbert Gombos Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Henrique Rocha
Player
Norbert Gombos
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Norbert Gombos
Player
Alexey Zakharov
51%
(
46 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Norbert Gombos
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
47%
(
43 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
33 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
91
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jerome Kym
Player
Norbert Gombos
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Norbert Gombos
Player
Andrea Picchione
51%
(
64 of
126)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
105)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
51 of
68)
50%
(
31 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
39%
(
49 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
114
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Timofey Skatov
Player
Norbert Gombos
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Norbert Gombos
Player
Mateus Alves
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Norbert Gombos
Player
Henri Laaksonen
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juan Bautista Otegui
Player
Norbert Gombos
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Ulises Blanch Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF |
Facundo Mena
Player
Ulises Blanch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
54 of
108)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
11
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
98
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Ulises Blanch
Player
Lautaro Midon
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ulises Blanch
Player
Pedro Boscardin Dias
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ulises Blanch
Player
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Ulises Blanch
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ulises Blanch
Player
Saba Purtseladze
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
12
Aces
18
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
25 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Ulises Blanch
Player
Ben Jones
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
20%
(
10 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ulises Blanch
Player
Giorgi Giorgadze
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniil Glinka
Player
Ulises Blanch
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ulises Blanch
Player
Zura Tkemaladze
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
12
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Gombos Vs Blanch Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gombos are available here and Blanch photos here.